Evaluation and ethics
Moral and ethical issues in evaluation
Impact evaluation: Methodological and operational issues. Or continue to negotiate for a reasonable outcome that will maintain fairness to individuals and how they are represented and ensure credibility to external audiences and international sponsor, though it will delay payment to participants and have consequences for them and their families? Most evaluation and research texts where ethics are mentioned start with a reminder that there is no context-free abstract set of principles that can be applied to guide ethical decision-making in evaluation. Evaluation has to operate in this multilayered context of different interests, providing information to inform decisions while remaining independent of the policies and programmes themselves. This is not just a question of our personal predilection or moral stance. Consulting Module Ethics of Evaluation Ethics, the discipline of rights, morals, and principles that guide behavior, is an especially important topic in the evaluation of health programs, as many of the responsibilities of program evaluators involve interactions with other human beings. Guiding precepts are honesty, sincerity, kindness, respect for persons, being honourable. The ethics of a control group in randomized impact evaluations- the start of an ongoing discussion. Evaluation textbooks on the whole offer little guidance on this issue. Approaches on this site refer to an integrated package of options methods or processes. The differences between the control and intervention group indicators are used to identify the program effects. How then can the evaluator be assisted to conduct evaluations that are ethically defensible? Click an approach on the left to navigate to it Empowerment Evaluation A stakeholder involvement approach designed to provide groups with the tools and knowledge they need to monitor and evaluate their own performance and accomplish their goals.
A powerful institution, sponsor of a multicountry evaluation study, threatens to hold back payment to colleagues employed by them on projects which have been completed and independently evaluated, until the director of the evaluation agrees to the changes the institution wants made to the final evaluation report.
The ethics of a control group in randomized impact evaluations- the start of an ongoing discussion.
Appreciative enquiry A strengths-based approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation by identifying and investigating outlier examples of good practice and ways of increasing their frequency. The result is a lively journey through evaluation's ethical landscape that is also a genuinely instructive read.
In the past, these groups have been the targets of various unethical procedures and experiments, which is one reason for the heightened vigilance when dealing with these populations.
This allows for areas that are not initially chosen for implementation to be used as the control group, under the expectation that they will eventually receive the intervention in the future. Missed vaccination- Violation of ethics?
Furthermore, without a control group, evaluators could not determine the true efficacy of the drug.
Evaluation has to operate in this multilayered context of different interests, providing information to inform decisions while remaining independent of the policies and programmes themselves.
based on 98 review